Performance of standard and self-venting conformable compressed hydrogen storage systems in fire tests and incident car fire

“Abstract

This study investigates the fire resistance rating (FRR) of a conformable compressed hydrogen storage system (cCHSS) in realistic under-vehicle fire scenarios. Using validated 3D CFD and physical models, the FRR was shown to depend strongly on the fire’s heat release rate per unit area (HRR/A). Bare cCHSS exposed to a typical spill fire (HRR/A = 1 MW/m2) ruptured in 2 min 54 s, which is 2∼4 times shorter than the 6–12 min typical of standard tanks. A presence of metal casing increased the FRR up to fourfold, but only by 54 s (∼23 %) when direct contact occurred between metal casing and tank wall. The performance of self-venting tanks with microleaks-no-burst (μLNB) technology was demonstrated. These explosion-free tanks eliminate the need for TPRDs, as microleaks were triggered before structural failure, with leakage times between 18.5 and 28.5 min. The results support using TPRD-less cCHSS to increase hydrogen vehicle fire safety.”

 

Kashkarov S, Makarov D, Molkov V. Performance of standard and self-venting conformable compressed hydrogen storage systems in fire tests and incident car fire. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2025;156:150407.

The full report is accessible via: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.150407

 

For related publications please see Resources – UK National Clean Maritime Research Hub

Policy Bulletin 004: Scrubber investment and market prices

Maritime policy bulletin 004 covers scrubber investment and market prices.

The International Maritime Organisation (IMO) introduced in 2020 a regulation restricting sulphur shipping emissions to 0.5%. Rather than purchasing more expensive low sulphur fuels, a scrubber can be installed on ships to meet this regulation with conventional fuel. Scrubber installation is a shipping technology that has high capital expenditure but enhances profitability. This is due to fuel cost savings when operating the vessel or higher freight income when leasing it out. Volatile fuel prices and freight rates mean that making such investment decisions is challenging.

This bulletin is based on research by Dr. Yao Shi and Dr. Ioannis Moutzouris of City St. Georges, University of London.

To download the full policy bulletin, please click the download button above.

To read other bulletins, please see: Resources – UK National Clean Maritime Research Hub

 

Suggested citation:

Shi, Y., Moutzouris, I., & Copeland, C. L. (2025). Scrubber investment and market prices. UK National Clean Maritime Research Hub. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20141537

Clean Maritime Assembly – Highlights and Headlines Presentations (Day 1)

Lightning-style presentations from industry and academia, showcasing clean maritime activity across the sector.

The following presentations are available for view as part of our Resources Library.

Session 1 – Future Fuels & Safety: Chaired by Prof Rachael Rothman, University of Sheffield

  • Kerry Mullen, Hynamics: “Producer and distributor of low-carbon and renewable hydrogen”
  • Dr Thomas Beard, BMT: “Alternative Fuel Shoreside Infrastructure: Challenges and Opportunities”
  • Dr Paul Davies, Lloyds Register: “Safety Challenges, Alternative Fuels”

Session 2 – Power & Propulsion: Chaired by Dr Angad Panesar, Brighton University

  • Ben Pollock, Mott MacDonald: “Shore Power: Challenge and Opportunities”
  • Martin Olverson, NatPower Marine: “Plotting a course to cleaner shipping”

Session 3 – Vessel Design & Efficiency: Chaired by Dr Janie Ling-Chin, Durham University

  • Dr Inguna Strazdina, NTNU: “Innovating Ocean Operations and Coastal Infrastructure for a Clean Maritime Future”
  • David Wing, Houlder Ltd: “Connecting Ship Design and Operation”
  • Keith Hutchinson, Safinah Ltd: “Holistic ship design and realisation for operational efficiency and sustainability over the life cycle”

Clean Maritime Assembly – Beneath the Surface Presentations (Day 1)

Presentations from researchers within the Clean Maritime Research Hub, alongside complementary industry insights.

The following presentations are available for view as part of our Resources Library.

Session 1 – Power & Propulsion: Chaired by Dr Dawei Wu, University of Birmingham

  • Dr Dibyendu Roy, Durham University: “Integrated Power & Carbon Capture”
  • Chris Poyner, ABB: “ABB Power and Propulsion”

 Session 2 – Vessel Design & Efficiency: Chaired by Prof Andrew Smallbone, Durham University

  • Prof Zhiqiang Hu, Newcastle University: “Vessel Design, Efficiency and Innovation in Action”
  • Captain Simon Merritt, Carisbrooke Shipping: “Carisbrooke Shipping Innovation”

 Session 3 – Future Fuels: Chaired by Dr Jean-Baptiste Souppez, Aston University

  • Prof Alasdair Cairns, University of Nottingham: “On-board Ammonia Cracking: Enabling Technology for Deep Decarbonisation of Maritime”
  • David Browbank, Brookes Bell: “Marine Fuels: past, present and future”

Clean Maritime Assembly – Beneath the Surface Presentations (Day 2)

Presentations from researchers within the Clean Maritime Research Hub, alongside complementary industry insights.

The following presentations are available for view as part of our Resources Library.

Session 1 – Digitalisation, Operational Considerations & Logistics: Chaired by Prof Dongping Song, University of Liverpool

  • Prof Ying Xie, Cranfield University: “Using AI to Improve the Efficiency of Port Operations”
  • Dr Çağatay Iris, University of Liverpool: “Integrated Energy and Operations Management in Port Microgrids”

Session 2 – Finance & Economics: Chaired by Dr Richard Williams, Durham University

  • Dr Ioannis Moutzouris, City St Georges, University of London: “Interplay Between Green Investment and Market Prices in Global Shipping”
  • Matt Wilson, Navigator Terminals: “Energising tomorrow”

Session 3 – Ports: Chaired by Prof Richard Lord, Teesside University

  • Prof Dongping Song, University of Liverpool: “Port Decarbonisation”
  • Steven Wilson, Freeport East: “Freeport East’s role in supporting Clean Maritime”

Clean Maritime Assembly – Bridging the Gap Presentations (Day 1)

Presentations from researchers funded through our Flexible Funding Programme, which bridge the gap between our core activity and new, emerging research areas, alongside some presentations from our consortium researchers.

The following presentations are available for view as part of our Resources Library.

Session 1 – Vessel Design & Efficiency: Chaired by Dr Mengda Wu, University of Birmingham

  • Dr David Hitchmough, Liverpool John Moores University: “LJMU’s Research into Maritime Decarbonisation Technologies”
  • Dr Tom Smith, University College London: “Numerical Modelling of Air Layer Drag Reduction”

Session 2 – Future Fuels & Safety: Chaired by Dr Mengda Wu, University of Birmingham

  • Dr Sergii Kashkarov, Ulster University: “Marine fuel storage, safety operation and handling”

Session 3 – Power & Propulsion: Chaired by Dr Mohamad Tamam, Brighton University

  • Dr Liang Yang, Cranfield University: “Wave Propulsion for Maritime Transport”
  • Dr Arijit De, University of Manchester: “Voyage Planning for Vessels Using Alternate Fuels, Battery Electric and Wind Propulsion”

Clean Maritime Assembly – Bridging the Gap Presentations (Day 2)

Presentations from researchers funded through our Flexible Funding Programme, which bridge the gap between our core activity and new, emerging research areas, alongside some presentations from our consortium researchers.

The following presentations are available for view as part of our Resources Library.

Session 1 – Finance & Economics of Shipping Decarbonisation: Chaired by Dr Ioannis Moutzouris, City St Georges University of London

  • Prof Ioannis Kyriakou, City St Georges, University of London: “Greening the Fleet, Raising the Price? Shipping Decarbonisation and UK Inflation Dynamics”
  • Dr Yao Shi, City St Georges, University of London: “Economics of Shipping Decarbonisation: Carbon, Production, Cost and Allocative Efficiencies”

Session 2 – Ports: Chaired by Dr Jonathan Wellings, University of Sheffield

  • Dr Sean Loughney, Liverpool John Moores University: “HYDRO-Port: Safety Management and Risk Assessment of liquid hydrogen bunkering and storage in ports”
  • Dr Szymon Szatkowski, Edinburgh Napier University: “The Dolphin – A New Wave Energy Conversion Device for Sustainable Ports”

Session 3 – Digitalisation, Autonomy & Transportation: Chaired by Dr Reza Eshtehadi, University of Liverpool

  • Amin Nazemian, University of Strathclyde: “Sustainable Waterborne Transportation (SWAT): Enhancing Sustainable Freight Transport Through Swarming of Zero-emission Fleet for UK Waterways”
  • Dr Asefe Forghani, Cranfield University: “Digital Decision-Support Tools for Ferry Port Decarbonisation: Energy-Aware Scheduling with Landside Traffic Simulation”

Stability of non-premixed turbulent methane flames: Numerical simulations of the critical diameter and flame stability limits

“Abstract

A Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model is developed and validated against experimental data to predict the critical diameter and stability limits of non-premixed turbulent methane flames. The critical diameter defines the orifice size beyond which a stable flame persists at all driving pressures and below this pressure stability is pressure-dependent. Flame stability follows a “peninsula” curve of pressure versus release diameter, with sustained flames above the upper and below the lower pressure limits, while the intermediate region represents a blow-out zone where combustion is not sustained. The critical diameter, at the curve’s rightmost point, is crucial for predicting sustained flames. Methane releases have been simulated for conditions in the region of the critical diameter, and for diameters and pressures ranging from 15 to 45 mm and 0.01 to 20 MPa, respectively, corresponding to the upper and lower flame stability limits using the realizable k − ε model and EDC combustion model. The simulations accurately captured blow-out and sustained flames, yielding a critical diameter of 42 mm, consistent with experiments. A methane flame at 5.88 MPa gauge through a 50 mm orifice was also simulated, showing flame length and lift-off distance in agreement with experimental observations. These results confirm the model’s reliability in predicting methane flame stability, providing valuable insights for safety and combustion applications. This study presents the first CFD-based reproduction of the full methane flame stability curve, validating model reliability across a wide pressure range and providing a predictive tool for future applications, including the assessment of flame stability in methane‑hydrogen mixtures.”

 

Kazemi, M., Brennan, S. and Vladimir Molkov (2025). Stability of non-premixed turbulent methane flames: Numerical simulations of the critical diameter and flame stability limits. Fuel Processing Technology, 275, pp.108249–108249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2025.108249.

The full report is accessible via: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2025.108249

 

For related publications please see Resources – UK National Clean Maritime Research Hub

LES of atmospheric dispersion of ammonia from storage tank ullage space under real meandering wind currents in 800 m domain

“Abstract

This study aims to develop and validate a CFD model for large eddy simulations of gaseous ammonia released from the ullage space of a storage tank through the piping system to the atmosphere under realistic wind conditions measured experimentally. The simulations are validated against Test No.1 conducted by INERIS (Bouet et al., 2005) of 460 s release duration with ammonia concentration decay measured up to 800 m downwind of the release nozzle. The computational domain was designed to represent a large-scale atmospheric dispersion scenario in conditions of meandering wind currents. The atmospheric turbulence is simulated by incorporating real-time meteorological data on wind direction and speed oscillations. The proposed methodology accounts for meandering wind currents. This methodology, combined with sub-grid scale Smagorinsky-Lilly turbulence modelling, enables accurate simulations of ammonia dispersion observed in the experiment. The simulations reproduced measured in the near-field (20 m from the release nozzle) transient ammonia concentration with high accuracy. The simulations also accurately captured the average concentration decay up to 800 m downwind of the release location. The hazard distance defined by the flammability of the ammonia-air mixture is estimated as 13.2 m from the release. The maximum toxicity cloud envelope extends to 205 m downwind, 9.5 m vertically, and 21.3 m laterally for the fatality threshold and increasing to 837 m, 18 m, and 53 m, respectively, for the injury limit. The study highlights the importance of proper modelling and simulations of real wind meandering currents for predicting realistic hazard distances.”

 

Srinivas Sivaraman, Dmitriy Makarov, Benjamin Truchot, Vladimir Molkov, LES of atmospheric dispersion of ammonia from storage tank ullage space under real meandering wind currents in 800 m domain, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Volume 494, 2025,138712,

The full report is accessible via: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138712

 

For related publications please see Resources – UK National Clean Maritime Research Hub

The multi-peaks structure of the blast wave generated by a liquid hydrogen storage tank BLEVE

“Abstract

Blast wave structure of boiling liquid expanding vapour explosions (BLEVE) for liquid hydrogen (LH2) storage is not fully understood. There is a lack of experimental and numerical studies on underlying physical phenomena. This study develops a CFD model able to simulate multiple pressure peaks of the blast wave accounting for both the effect of combustion on the strength of blast wave generated by the compressed gaseous hydrogen (CGH2) in ullage space, and the slower process of flashing boiling of the liquid phase resulted from pressure drop. The simulations reproduced the measured overpressures and multi-peak structure of blast wave observed in the BLEVE tests performed by BMW. It is confirmed that the larger first pressure peak is produced by the CGH2 shock fed by combustion. The flash boiling of LH2 during pressure drop produces a series of follow-up pressure waves. Combustion contribution to the entire blast wave dynamics is demonstrated.”

 

D. Cirrone, D. Makarov, V. Molkov, The multi-peaks structure of the blast wave generated by a liquid hydrogen storage tank BLEVE. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2025;133:416-430.

The full report is accessible via: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.392

 

For related publications please see Resources – UK National Clean Maritime Research Hub