Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII): Exploring the potential for an at port metric

This policy briefing explores the feasibility of improving the International Maritime Organization’s Carbon Intensity Indicator through developing a separate at port metric. It suggests that determining an appropriate at port metric would need to reflect the wide range of activities and conditions experienced by different vessel types and in different locations. This could be mainly achieved through consideration of an appropriate “useful work” definition.

Highlights:

  •  The cargo-carrying capacity and distance travelled used in CII do not reflect vessels’ at port activities
  •  Contracts between shipowners, operators, and charterers may not support CII rating improvements
  •  At port CII metric potentially valuable but limited by practical complexities
  •  Develop at sea CII metric first and further research how the at port part could work
  •  A review of the “useful work” definition should be undertaken for the various at port activities by vessel type
  •  As low(er) carbon fuels are adopted, other emissions – such as methane and nitrous oxide – and on a whole life cycle (“well-to-wake”) basis should be included in CII

 

Suggested citation:

Shi, Y., Copeland, C. L., & Moutzouris, I. (2026). Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII): Exploring the potential for an at port metric. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20056634

Ammonia as a sustainable marine fuel: Policy challenges and recommendations

The UK’s Maritime Decarbonisation Strategy commits to zero shipping emissions by 2050. Achieving this ambition will require coordinated action between industry and government, including investment in green ammonia production, port bunkering infrastructure, supportive regulation, and ongoing international engagement.

Shipping underpins everyday life, but it remains heavily reliant on fossil fuels and is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions. As the transition to a low‑carbon economy accelerates, the shipping sector faces growing pressure to adopt cleaner alternatives. Green ammonia is gaining attention as a potential low‑carbon marine fuel. With an established global supply chain, proven storage and handling practices, and the ability to build on existing industrial systems, it offers a credible pathway to reducing shipping emissions.

Drawing on research from MariNH3 and the UK National Clean Maritime Research Hub, this briefing explains what green ammonia is, why it matters for shipping, and the policy action needed to enable its safe and effective use. It explores the policy implications across three linked areas: using ammonia as a shipping fuel, ensuring green ammonia supply, and managing safety considerations.

 

This briefing is authored by Dr Laura Norris, MariNH3, Cardiff University and Dr Claire Copeland, UK National Clean Maritime Research Hub, Durham University.

FuelEU Maritime: Proposed Modification for the Non-Compliance Penalty Calculation

The European Union (EU) has implemented a tougher than IMO emission intensity indicator requirement for shipping. Under the FuelEU Maritime regulations a penalty applies where vessels are non-compliant to set greenhouse gas emission limits. In this Policy Briefing we outline why the penalty calculation is problematic – that it introduces distortions and undermines regulation objectives.

This policy briefing argues that:

  • The current formula calculates a penalty that is weaker for higher emitters, causes unequal treatment for fleets with the same level of non-compliance balance, and complicates the pooling mechanism.
  • Proposed modification would be to replace the Actual GHG Intensity with the Target GHG Intensity in the penalty payment calculation.
  • For the UK Government, in the expected fuel standard consultation and implementation, we recommend that such distorting effects are avoided rather than harmonising with the EU.

This policy briefing is based on the research and policy expertise of Professor Dongping Song, and Dr Claire Copeland.

IMO Short-term Measures: A Review of the Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII)

The Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) is one of the short-term measures introduced by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from shipping. This policy brief reviews the measure and provides improvement recommendations, focusing on how emission standards at sea and at port should be dealt with.

Key Highlights:

  • CII is currently insufficient for capturing emissions accurately at sea and at port and incentivising emission reduction
  • A range of revision options could be considered such as excluding port emissions, adjustments for time at port, or separate metrics for at sea and at port
  • Other areas that could be considered include allowance for actual cargo, well- to-wake emissions, and pilot fuel

Recommended revision for CII is to use separate metrics for at sea and at port emissions.

This policy briefing is based on research undertaken by Dr Ioannis Moutzouris, Dr Yao Shi, and Dr Claire Copeland.

Hydrogen jet flame stabilisation mechanism for square and rectangular openings: Internal flame retention

“Abstract

Hydrogen is stored at high pressure making discharge a safety concern, including flame stability issue. Previous studies were focused on circular nozzles. However, actual incidents are more likely to involve slit-shaped openings. The experiments on hydrogen release from non-circular openings were conducted for nozzle cross-sectional areas equal to circular orifices of diameters 0.5, 0.6, 0.8 mm, with aspect ratios for rectangular orifices 1, 2, 4, 6, 8. For rectangular nozzles, expansion waves are generated from the corners in addition to those originating from the nozzle lip. These waves interfere causing an “axis-switching” phenomenon and formation of octagonal Mach disk, producing jet with wider velocity boundary, thus greater air entrainment and consequently 10–30 % shorter flame length. The lift-off length for rectangular openings, i.e. 10-15 mm was approximately half that of circular nozzles. The experimental and numerical study of non-combusting jet shed light on the flame stabilisation mechanism for rectangular nozzles identified as internal flame retention, i.e. anchoring the flame base at low-velocity region at the root of the cross-shaped velocity and hydrogen concentration distributions.”

 

Keiji Takeno, Makoto Asahara, Koichi Kajino, Ito, D., Mizuno, Y., Volodymyr Shentsov, Kazemi, M., Makarov, D. and Vladimir Molkov (2025). Hydrogen jet flame stabilisation mechanism for square and rectangular openings: Internal flame retention. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 202, pp.152934–152934. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.152934.

The full report is accessible via: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.152934

 

For related publications please see Resources – UK National Clean Maritime Research Hub

Policy Bulletin 007: CO2 Emission Reduction Technologies for Shipping

Maritime policy bulletin 007 covers CO2 emission reduction technologies for shipping.

In recent years maritime shipping has emitted approx. one gigatonne of carbon dioxide (CO2) per annum. Based on current trends this is projected to increase 150-250% by 2050, but the International Maritime Organisation has set targets of 30% reduction by 2030 and net-zero by 2050.

This work reviewed the potential for different emission reduction technologies to reach those targets.

This bulletin is based on a recent publication by Dr Sina Fadaie,  Professor Jean-Baptiste R. G. Souppez and Professor Patricia Thornley titled A systematic review of technologies, measures, and CO2 emission reduction potential for maritime transport decarbonisation.

To download the full policy bulletin, please click the download button above.

To read other bulletins, please see: Resources – UK National Clean Maritime Research Hub

A systematic review of technologies, measures, and CO2 emission reduction potential for maritime transport decarbonisation

“Abstract

The maritime shipping sector is a significant contributor to global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, accounting for approximately 2.7%-3% of global emissions. In response, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has set ambitious targets: a 30% reduction in emissions by 2030, 80% by 2040, and net-zero by 2050, relative to 2008 levels. Meeting these goals requires a comprehensive understanding of the full range of viable decarbonisation measures. Therefore, this study conducts a systematic review of maritime decarbonisation measures, applying the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. Unlike previous studies, this paper not only provides an updated overview of CO2 reduction measures but also maps them to specific vessel types based on data reported in the literature. Furthermore, the findings are compared with literature to highlight shifts in mitigation potential. A case study is also included to schematically demonstrate how these measures can be applied in practice. Following a rigorous analysis: (i) thirty-two individual CO2 mitigation measures were identified and classified into six categories, (ii) alternative fuels shown the highest long-term potential (5%–100% CO2 emission reduction), whereas hull design improvements show the lowest (1%–20%), (iii) the wide disparity in reported abatement values is attributed to inconsistent system boundaries, variability in fuel origin, partial-blend scenarios, and differing assumptions across studies, (iv) combinations of measures provide the most practical and realistic pathway to phased emissions reduction. These findings are expected to assist decision-makers in selecting effective, context-appropriate strategies to support global maritime decarbonisation and ensure long-term sectoral sustainability.”

 

Fadaie, S., Thornley, P. and Souppez, J.-B. (2025). A systematic review of technologies, measures, and CO2 emission reduction potential for maritime transport decarbonisation. Advances in Applied Energy, p.100255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2025.100255.

The full report is accessible via: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2025.100255

For related publications, please see Resources – UK National Clean Maritime Research Hub

Thermal response of composite hydrogen tank and TPRD during fast fuelling

“Abstract

High-pressure composite tanks are widely used for gaseous hydrogen storage. A safety concern and knowledge gap is the potential overheating of components, including TPRD, during fast fuelling. This study presents a numerical investigation of the thermal response of a 12-litre tank with L/D = 9 under various fuelling conditions, e.g. tank orientation, and a fuelling failure scenario with excessive mass flow rate. The simulation demonstrated that, for a 3-min fuelling duration, the temperature non-uniformity (maximum–bulk difference) in horizontally oriented hydrogen tanks exceeds 29 °C. Vertical top-down fuelling reduces gradients by about 40 %, whereas bottom-up fuelling increases temperature non-uniformity and must be avoided. An extreme fuelling failure scenario with a mass flow rate of 50 g/s shows that hydrogen temperatures can exceed 300 °C. However, TPRD activation remains unlikely due to slow heat transfer to the sensing element. Monitoring only the average temperature is misleading as local temperature may exceed 85 °C and affect liner integrity.”

 

Hanguang Xie, Sergii Kashkarov, Dmitriy Makarov, Vladimir Molkov, Thermal response of composite hydrogen tank and TPRD during fast fuelling, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 173, 2025, 151376

The full report is accessible via: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.151376

 

For related publications please see Resources – UK National Clean Maritime Research Hub

State of the Art in Wind Assisted Ship Propulsion for Maritime Decarbonisation and Sustainable Shipping: A Systematic Review

“Abstract

The advent of modern wind propulsion systems (WPS) to answer contemporary and forthcoming regulatory requirements to reduce shipping emissions has prompted the development of multiple technologies, ranging from sails to rotating cylinders, to kites. However, as the benefits of WPS for wind-assisted ships are still based on predictions due to the lack of operational, on-water data, the most promising technologies and areas of future research remain unclear. Moreover, the lack of consistent research methodologies and test conditions has led to large reported divergences in the potential of WPS in the literature. Consequently, to ascertain the comparative potential of WPS to reduce shipping emissions and present the state of the art in wind propulsion for ships, a systematic review is undertaken, with the aim to quantify the carbon dioxide (CO2) emission reductions associated with each type of WPS. The systematic literature review methodology ensures unbiased results, while accurately reporting the latest research developments in the field. Here we quantify the benefits of WPS, with an average 17% reduction in CO2 emissions, with an interquartile range from 7.5% to 22.5%. Moreover, we identify Flettner rotors as both the most studied and most commonly installed WPS, and note a discrepancy for suction wings, with a large share of installed WPS, but only very little published research. Additionally, we critically appraise current practices in the analysis of WPS, ranging from true wind and ship speed to the vessel type and size. These findings provide a novel and holistic overview of wind propulsion of ships, as well as the first systematic review on the topic, allowing an unbiased assessment of wind propulsion for ships. It is anticipated that these results may inform future research directions in sustainable shipping, and inform policymakers on the benefits of wind propulsion to meet emission regulations. Moreover, recommendations for more consistent reporting of WPS studies have been provided to support future global research and enable quantitative comparison across all published work.”

 

Huang, J. and Souppez, J.-B. (2025). State of the Art in Wind Assisted Ship Propulsion for Maritime Decarbonisation and Sustainable Shipping: A Systematic Review. Journal of Sailing Technology, 10(01), pp.258–278. doi:https://doi.org/10.5957/jst/2025.10.1.258.

The full report is accessible via: https://doi.org/10.5957/jst/2025.10.1.258 

 

For related publications please see Resources – UK National Clean Maritime Research Hub

Towards CFD Modelling of Multi-Peak Structure of Liquid Hydrogen Storage Tank “BLEVE”

“Abstract

Liquid hydrogen (LH2) storage tanks are equipped with pressure relief devices (PRD) to vent hydrogen and avoid the pressure build-up in a tank due to heat transfer from the ambient, including in case of fire. In the event of a PRD failure, the tank structural integrity may be compromised leading to catastrophic rupture of the storage tank releasing the stored energy and producing destructive blast wave, fireball and projectiles. The present paper presents a CFD model to investigate the underlying physical processes of what is called “BLEVE” and assess the blast wave generated by an LH2 storage tank rupture in a fire. The proposed CFD approach advances the previous model (Cirrone et al., 2023) to include the effect of flash evaporation of LH2 during pressure drop after tank rupture and reproduce the multi-peak overpressure structure observed in experiments performed by BMW. Simulation results show that the observed maximum pressure peak is associated with the gaseous phase “explosion”, whereas the series of secondary pressure peaks, smaller in amplitude and of longer duration, are associated with the flash evaporation of the LH2 fraction stored in the tank. Simulations can reproduce the minimum and maximum overpressures measured at 3 m from the storage tank in BMW experiments. The simulated maximum blast wave pressure is seen to increase with the storage pressure and volumetric fraction of the gaseous hydrogen phase in the tank prior to rupture.”

 

Cirrone D., Makarov D., Molkov V., 2025, Towards CFD Modelling of Multi-Peak Structure of Liquid Hydrogen Storage Tank “BLEVE”, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 116, 247-252.

The full report is accessible via: https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/CET25116042

 

For related publications please see Resources – UK National Clean Maritime Research Hub